Time For The MSM To Admit They Were Wrong About WMDs

Saddam's WMDs and programs have been a long-standing point of contention in this nation. The common argument is that he had none, and that the president lied to get us into Iraq. Well, as John Hinderacker of PowerLine points out today, that just isn't true. And Investor's Business Daily backs him up with an editorial entitled "Saddam Had WMD."

Now that Leno and Letterman have had their way with Vice President Cheney's hunting accident and the port controversy, maybe we can get back to something really important — like Saddam's WMD program.

Yes, the linchpin of opposition to the Iraq War — never really strong to begin with — has taken some real hits in recent weeks. And "Bush lied" — the anti-war mantra about the president, Saddam Hussein and weapons of mass destruction — looks the most battered.

Inconveniently for critics of the war, Saddam made tapes in his version of the Oval Office. These tapes landed in the hands of American intelligence and were recently aired publicly.

The first 12 hours of the tapes — there are hundreds more waiting to be translated — are damning, to say the least. They show conclusively that Bush didn't lie when he cited Saddam's WMD plans as one of the big reasons for taking the dictator out.

Nobody disputes the tapes' authenticity. On them, Saddam talks openly of programs involving biological, chemical and, yes, nuclear weapons.

War foes have long asserted that Saddam halted his WMD programs in the wake of his defeat in the first Gulf War in 1991. Saddam's abandonment of WMD programs was confirmed by subsequent U.N. inspections.

Again, not true. In a tape dating to April 1995, Saddam and several aides discuss the fact that U.N. inspectors had found traces of Iraq's biological weapons program. On the tape, Hussein Kamel, Saddam's son-in-law, is heard gloating about fooling the inspectors.

"We did not reveal all that we have," he says. "Not the type of weapons, not the volume of the materials we imported, not the volume of the production we told them about, not the volume of use. None of this was correct."

There's more. Indeed, as late as 2000, Saddam can be heard in his office talking with Iraqi scientists about his ongoing plans to build a nuclear device. At one point, he discusses Iraq's plasma uranium program — something that was missed entirely by U.N. weapons inspectors combing Iraq for WMD.

This is particularly troubling, since it indicates an active, ongoing attempt by Saddam to build an Iraqi nuclear bomb.

"What was most disturbing," said John Tierney, the ex- FBI agent who translated the tapes, "was the fact that the individuals briefing Saddam were totally unknown to the U.N. Special Commission (or UNSCOM, the group set up to look into Iraq's WMD programs)."

Perhaps most chillingly, the tapes record Iraq Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz talking about how easy it would be to set off a WMD in Washington. The comments come shortly after Saddam muses about using "proxies" in a terror attack.

9-11, anyone?

In short, let us repeat: President Bush was right. We had to invade to disarm Saddam — otherwise, he would have completely reconstituted his chemical, nuclear and bio-weapons programs when inspectors left.

Saddam probably knew better than to use them himself against the U.S. But it's likely he wouldn't have hesitated giving one or more to terror groups with which he had routine contact.

Lest you think we're making the case entirely based on these tapes, let us assure you that other evidence — mounting by the day — points to the same conclusion.

We've been very impressed by the story told by Georges Sada, the former No. 2 in Iraq's air force. He has written a book, "Saddam's Secrets," that details how the Iraqi dictator used trucks, commercial jets and ships to remove his WMD from the country. At the time, the move went largely undetected, because Iraq pretended the massive movement of materiel was to help Syrian flood victims.

Nor is Sada alone. Ali Ibrahim, another of Saddam's former commanders, has largely corroborated Sada's story.

So how was Saddam able to use his "cheat and retreat" tactics without being found out? He had help, according to a former U.S. Defense Department official.

"The short answer to the question of where the WMD Saddam bought from the Russians went was that they went to Syria and Lebanon," said John Shaw, former deputy undersecretary of defense, in comments made at an intelligence summit Feb. 17-20 in Arlington, Va.

"They were moved by Russian Spetsnaz (special ops) units out of uniform that were specifically sent to Iraq to move the weaponry and eradicate any evidence of its existence," he said.

These are extraordinary developments. They deserve a full airing in the media, since they essentially validate part of Bush's casus belli for invading Iraq and deposing the murderous Saddam.

But once again, the mainstream media have dropped the ball. They seem more interested in Dick Cheney's marksmanship and American port management than in setting the record straight about one of the most important developments of our time.

Now, let's put this piece--detailing evidence the MSM doesn't want to cover--with this from John, this post where we covered the Weekly Standard piece revolving around Saddam's connections to terrorists, and this post I did documenting Saddam's specific ties to al Qaeda.

Now, I highlighted the point above of using terrorists as "proxies." Can anyone imagine the devestation that would have been caused had any of these animals would have gotten their hands on a WMD? The world dawdled in dealing with him, and those weapons are still out there. The intelligence coming out now not only jusitifies our invasion of Iraq, and the removal of Saddam Hussein, but it vindicates the president. The moonbats that refuse to see this are either simply sheeple afraid of straying from the lemming-like pack mentality of the Left, or they are literally that ignorant. I'm voting for the latter.

It literally matters not. The evidence is coming out left and right on this issue, and the Democrats were wrong. All the antiwar moonbats claiming that "Bush lied, people died" have no leg left to stand on. He had them. He was working on more, including a couple of things that even we didn't know about. His ties to terrorism coupled with his desire for more WMDs--more destructive WMDs--made him a threat that the region could ill afford to have around any longer. And, we're reaching that point wit Iran right now, and like Leno and Letterman, they have chosen to ignore that, too.

Not to worry. At least bloggers know how to keep up with "real" news, as opposed to another agenda-driven, MSM-concocted "conspiracy" theory about who is guilty of what. In closing, I'd just like to add this:

We told you so. Time to wake up, smell the coffee, and pay the piper. Maybe the new mantra should be "The MSM lied, and people continued to die." That is until the US showed up, and put an animal in his own, private cage where he couldn't hurt anyone, or threaten anyone, any longer.

Publius II